Evaluation of One-to-One Midwifery: Women's Responses to Care
- 1 June 1998
- Vol. 25 (2) , 73-80
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536x.1998.00073.x
Abstract
Background: One‐to‐one midwifery was a demonstration project introduced into a London‐based maternity service in 1993 to put into practice the new government policy for maternity services in England. Evaluation was integral to the development of the project. Methods: The evaluation of women's responses was conducted between August 1994 and August 1995 based on a longitudinal, self‐completion questionnaire, interviews, and focus groups. Women in the study group (n= 728) received the new service and women in the control group (n= 675) received conventional care. The study design integrated quantitative and qualitative methods and went beyond a simple estimation of satisfaction with care. Results: Satisfaction with antenatal and birth care was generally high, but study group women showed more positive responses overall. Both groups showed a preference for continuity of caregiver, but expectations were higher in the study group (72% of the study group and 42% of the control group preferred to see one caregiver). Both groups had less satisfied responses to hospital postnatal care (50% study and 54% control group were very satisfied). Study group women showed greater preparedness for birth than control group women (18% vs 12%“very well prepared”) and for the time after the baby's birth (26% vs 15%“very prepared”). Conclusions: The study demonstrated that women were more satisfied with the one‐to‐one model of care. Taken together with the results of clinical and economic audit and professional responses, the evaluation suggests that this model should be developed and evaluated further to gain a greater understanding of women's needs of the maternity service. (BIRTH 25:2 June 1998)This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Midwives' burnout and continuity of careBritish Journal of Midwifery, 1997
- Assessing quality of care: what are the implications of the potential lack of sensitivity of outcome measures to differences in quality?Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1996
- Qualitative research in health care: I. The scope and validity of methodsJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1996
- Women's Satisfaction with Prenatal Care Settings: A Focus Group StudyBirth, 1996
- Social support in pregnancy: Does it have long-term effects?Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 1996
- Change and Power in MidwiferyBirth, 1995
- Satisfaction With Care in Labor and Birth: A Survey of 790 Australian WomenBirth, 1994
- Satisfaction with Childbirth: Theories and Methods of MeasurementBirth, 1993
- Detection of Postnatal DepressionThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1987
- What is, must be best: A research note on conservative or deferential responses to antenatal care provisionSocial Science & Medicine, 1984