A European survey of antimicrobial susceptibility among zoonotic and commensal bacteria isolated from food-producing animals
Open Access
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Vol. 54 (4) , 744-754
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh422
Abstract
Objective: To study antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic bacteria isolated from food animals in different countries using uniform methodology. Methods: Samples were taken at slaughter from chickens, pigs and cattle in four EU countries per host. Escherichia coli (indicator organism; n=2118), Salmonella spp. (n=271) and Campylobacter spp. (n=1325) were isolated in national laboratories and MICs tested in a central laboratory against, where appropriate, ampicillin, cefepime, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, gentamicin, nalidixic acid, streptomycin, tetracycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Results: Isolation rates were high for E. coli, low for Salmonella and intermediate for Campylobacter. MIC results showed resistance prevalence varied among compounds, hosts and countries. For E. coli and Salmonella, resistance to newer compounds (cefepime, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin) was absent or low, but to older compounds (except gentamicin), resistance was variable and higher. E. coli isolates from Sweden showed low resistance, whereas among isolates from Spain (pigs), resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, tetracycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was higher; the UK, France, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Denmark were intermediate. For Campylobacter spp. isolates from chickens, nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin resistance was >30% in France and the Netherlands, >6% in the UK and zero in Sweden. Nalidixic acid resistance was high in cattle (20%–64%), whereas ciprofloxacin resistance was markedly lower in cattle, variable in pigs (3%–21%) and highest in Sweden. Generally, Campylobacter coli was more resistant than Campylobacter jejuni. Conclusion: Antimicrobial resistance among enteric organisms in food animals varied among countries, particularly for older antimicrobials, but resistance to newer compounds used to treat disease in humans was generally low.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Role of Calf-Adapted Escherichia coli in Maintenance of Antimicrobial Drug Resistance in Dairy CalvesApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2004
- Susceptibilities of Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Germany to Ciprofloxacin, Moxifloxacin, Erythromycin, Clindamycin, and TetracyclineAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2003
- Use of PCR for Direct Detection of Campylobacter Species in Bovine FecesApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2003
- Impact and management of Campylobacter in human medicine — European perspectiveInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Increasing Fluoroquinolone Resistance inCampylobacter jejuni,Pennsylvania, USA,1982–20011Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Antimicrobial resistance: standardisation and harmonisation of laboratory methodologies for the detection and quantification of antimicrobial resistanceRevue Scientifique et Technique de l'OIE, 2001
- Use of antimicrobial agents in veterinary medicine and food animal productionInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2001
- Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance — what, how and whither?Clinical Microbiology & Infection, 2001
- Antibiotic resistance monitoring: the Spanish programmeInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2000
- Susceptibility of Campylobacter species to nalidixic acid, enoxacin, and other DNA gyrase inhibitorsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1985