Gram-Negative Bacteremias
- 1 April 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 141 (5) , 582-586
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1981.00340050034011
Abstract
• We reviewed the charts of 163 patients with 183 episodes of Gram-negative bacillary bacteremia to determine a clinical profile that would select patients at high risk for experiencing gentamicin-sulfate-resistant Gram-negative bacillary bacteremia at our hospital. Gentamicin-resistant Gram-negative bacilli were only associated with institution-acquired bacteremia. Among institution-acquired episodes, urinary tract infection, diagnostic or therapeutic procedures of the lower respiratory tract or urinary tract, presence of pneumonic infiltrate on chest roentgenogram, prior therapy with gentamicin, and prior therapy with other antibiotics were significant risk factors. Because only two of the 29 gentamicin-resistant bacteria that were tested against amikacin base were resistant to amikacin, we advocate initial treatment with amikacin for patients with evidence of an institution-acquired Gram-negative bacteremic episode. Gentamicin is still our initial choice for a community-acquired episode. (Arch Intern Med1981;141:582-586)This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Review of 152 patients with bacteremias treated wih amikacinThe American Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Amikacin therapy of gram-negative bacteremiaThe American Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Amikacin therapy for gram-negative septicemiaThe American Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Treatment of hospital-acquired infections with amikacinThe American Journal of Medicine, 1977