Succession and success: A new look at an old concept
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Sociological Spectrum
- Vol. 5 (3) , 269-289
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.1985.9981757
Abstract
The concept of “succession,” originally borrowed from plant ecologists, has been employed fruitfully by sociologists for over half a century. Social scientists. however, have tended to use the inherently dynamic concept in a relatively static way. Building on recent critiques, this paper notes that there are basically four meanings of the term that have special relevance to sociology, with traditional usage representing only one of the four. A meaning that has largely been ignored to date—"autogenic sociocultural succession”, in this paper's terminology—holds particular potential, drawing attention to the possibility that apparently “successful” actions can be self‐displacing as well as self‐reinforcing. Succession, as redefined, offers promise for conceptualizing social change not as a series of discrete steps, but as an ongoing process.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Boomtown's Youth: The Differential Impacts of Rapid Community Growth on Adolescents and AdultsAmerican Sociological Review, 1984
- Increased mental health caseloads in an energy boomtownAdministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1983
- The human ecology of parksLeisure Sciences, 1981
- Paradigmatic Change in Social ScienceAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1980
- INCORPORATIVE THE VIEWS OF THE UNINTERESTED BUT IMPACTED PUBLIC IN ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNINGPolicy Studies Journal, 1980
- Environmental SociologyAnnual Review of Sociology, 1979
- Perturbation Theory and the Subsidy-Stress GradientBioScience, 1979
- The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of PlaceAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1976
- Changes in Land Ownership as an Index of Succession in Rural CommunitiesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1938
- The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social ActionAmerican Sociological Review, 1936