Both Ligand- and Cell-Specific Parameters Control Ligand Agonism in a Kinetic Model of G Protein–Coupled Receptor Signaling
Open Access
- 12 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Computational Biology
- Vol. 3 (1) , e6
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030006
Abstract
G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) exist in multiple dynamic states (e.g., ligand-bound, inactive, G protein–coupled) that influence G protein activation and ultimately response generation. In quantitative models of GPCR signaling that incorporate these varied states, parameter values are often uncharacterized or varied over large ranges, making identification of important parameters and signaling outcomes difficult to intuit. Here we identify the ligand- and cell-specific parameters that are important determinants of cell-response behavior in a dynamic model of GPCR signaling using parameter variation and sensitivity analysis. The character of response (i.e., positive/neutral/inverse agonism) is, not surprisingly, significantly influenced by a ligand's ability to bias the receptor into an active conformation. We also find that several cell-specific parameters, including the ratio of active to inactive receptor species, the rate constant for G protein activation, and expression levels of receptors and G proteins also dramatically influence agonism. Expressing either receptor or G protein in numbers several fold above or below endogenous levels may result in system behavior inconsistent with that measured in endogenous systems. Finally, small variations in cell-specific parameters identified by sensitivity analysis as significant determinants of response behavior are found to change ligand-induced responses from positive to negative, a phenomenon termed protean agonism. Our findings offer an explanation for protean agonism reported in β2--adrenergic and α2A-adrenergic receptor systems. G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) are transmembrane proteins involved in physiological functions ranging from vasodilation and immune response to memory. The binding of both endogenous ligands (e.g., hormones, neurotransmitters) and exogenous ligands (e.g., pharmaceuticals) to these receptors initiates intracellular events that ultimately lead to cell responses. We describe a dynamic model for G protein activation, an immediate outcome of GPCR signaling, and use it together with efficient parameter variation and sensitivity analysis techniques to identify the key cell- and ligand-specific parameters that influence G protein activation. Our results show that although ligand-specific parameters do strongly influence cell response (either causing increases or decreases in G protein activation), cellular parameters may also dictate the magnitude and direction of G protein activation. We apply our findings to describe how protean agonism, a phenomenon in which the same ligand may induce both positive and negative responses, may result from changes in cell-specific parameters. These findings may be used to understand the molecular basis of different responses of cell types and tissues to pharmacological treatment. In addition, these methods may be applied generally to models of cellular signaling and will help guide experimental resources toward further characterization of the key parameters in these networks.Keywords
This publication has 95 references indexed in Scilit:
- Signal Processing in the TGF-β Superfamily Ligand-Receptor NetworkPLoS Computational Biology, 2006
- Comparative study of parameter sensitivity analyses of the TCR-activated Erk-MAPK signalling pathwaySystems Biology, 2006
- The human immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in lung and lymph nodeJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2004
- Regulators of G-Protein signalling as new central nervous system drug targetsNature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2002
- Timing is everythingLife Sciences, 2000
- The Cubic Ternary Complex Receptor-Occupancy Model III. Resurrecting EfficacyJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1996
- The Cubic Ternary Complex Receptor–Occupancy Model I. Model DescriptionJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1996
- Different Sensitivity of α2A-C10 and α2C-C4 Receptor Subtypes in Coupling to Inhibition of cAMP AccumulationBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1994
- Rapid kinetics of .alpha.2-adrenergic inhibition of adenylate cyclase. Evidence for a distal rate-limiting stepBiochemistry, 1989
- An Examination of Response-Surface Methodologies for Uncertainty Analysis in Assessment ModelsTechnometrics, 1985