A thoughtful appraisal of measuring cognition using the role category questionnaire
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Reports
- Vol. 3 (2) , 49-57
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219009367504
Abstract
One assumption of the Role Category Questionnaire (RCQ) as a measure of cognitive complexity is that the sample of constructs it elicits represents a stable feature of individual difference. Two experiments investigating the RCQ's stability were conducted. Results for Study 1 demonstrated that changing RCQ instructions elicits a significantly greater amount of constructs compared to previous studies. Study 2 also showed varying instructions for construct, production increased mean number of constructs generated and changed the rank‐ordered relationships of complexity scores. Results suggest the RCQ's method of sampling the cognitive system yields unstable and sample‐bound scores. Possible refinements in assessing cognitive complexity are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Erroneous assumptions underlying Burleson's critiqueCommunication Quarterly, 1987
- More evidence that cognitive complexity isnotloquacity: A reply to Beatty and PayneCommunication Quarterly, 1987
- Consistencies in theoretical and naive evaluations of comforting messagesCommunication Monographs, 1985
- IS CONSTRUCT DIFFERENTIATION LOQUACITY?.Human Communication Research, 1985
- Construct differentiation as a moderator of attitude‐behavior consistency: A failure to confirmCentral States Speech Journal, 1984
- Age, social?cognitive development, and the use of comforting strategiesCommunication Monographs, 1984
- Loquacity and quantity of constructs as predictors of social perspective?takingCommunication Quarterly, 1984
- SOCIAL COGNITION, EMPATHIC MOTIVATION, AND ADULTS' COMFORTING STRATEGIESHuman Communication Research, 1983
- IS COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY LOQUACITY? A REPLY TO POWERS, JORDAN, AND STREETHuman Communication Research, 1981
- Social schemas, cognitive complexity, and the learning of social structures1Journal of Personality, 1973