Carbamezapine for pain management in Guillain-Barré syndrome patients in the intensive care unit
- 1 March 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 28 (3) , 655-658
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200003000-00009
Abstract
To evaluate carbamezapine (CBZ) for neuritic pain relief in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Prospective, double-blind, randomly allocated cross-over study days. ICU in a tertiary care university hospital. Twelve consecutive, conscious adult (22-54 yrs) patients with GBS during recovery from the muscular weakness and receiving pressure-support ventilation in the ICU. All patients complained of severe backache and/or leg cramps and tenderness in muscles, and they required opioids for pain relief. CBZ (100 mg every 8 hrs) or equivalent placebo was given to nursing staff in coded powder form. Medication was given to patients through a nasogastric feeding tube. The same coded medicine was given for 3 days, and after a 1-day omission, a second set of coded powder was given for the next 3 days in a randomized, double-blind, crossover fashion. Pethidine (1 mg x kg(-1)) was given intravenously in between, if the pain score was >2. Group 1 (n = 6) patients were given a placebo on the first 3 days, followed by CBZ. Group 2 (n = 6) patients were given CBZ on the first 3 days, followed by a placebo. In these two study periods of different medications, we observed and scored pain (1, no pain; 5, severe pain), sedation (1, alert; 6, asleep, does not respond to verbal command), and total pethidine requirement per day. In group 1 patients, a significant (p < .001) improvement in the sedation score and a low requirement for pethidine was observed 3 days later, when CBZ was started. However, in group 2 patients, a gradual increase in the pethidine requirement and a high sedation score were noteworthy in the later days of placebo medication. Observations were also analyzed for CBZ days vs. placebo days. Overall, the pain score (1.7 +/- 0.8) during the CBZ period of both regimens was significantly (p < .001) lower than during the placebo days (3.1 +/- 0.9). Significantly higher doses of pethidine (3.7 +/- 0.9 mg/kg/day) were used on the placebo days than on the CBZ days (1.7 +/- 1.0 mg/kg/day). The pain in GBS has a dual origin, and we recommend CBZ as an adjuvant to treat pain in GBS patients, during the recovery phase in the ICU, to reduce the narcotic requirement.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of intraoperative ketorolac on postanesthesia care unit comfortJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1994
- Comparative Effects of Ketorolac, Dezocine, and Fentanyl as Adjuvants During Outpatient AnesthesiaAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1992
- Gastrointestinal Damage Associated with the Use of Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory DrugsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Epidural Opioids for the Management of Pain in a Patient with the Guillain-Barré SyndromeAnesthesiology, 1990
- Pain in Guillain-Barre SyndromeArchives of Neurology, 1984
- Renal Syndromes Associated with Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory DrugsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Effects of carbamazepine, clonazepam, and phenytoin on seizure threshold in amygdala and cortexExperimental Neurology, 1983
- The Guillain-Barré Syndrome, A Personal ExperienceAnesthesiology, 1977
- Pain Mechanisms: A New TheoryScience, 1965
- THE LANDRY-GUILLAIN-BARR?? SYNDROMEMedicine, 1949