Abstract
In this study we show that phosphorylation of extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK1/2; also known as p44/42MAPK) following peroxynitrite (ONOO) exposure occurs via a MAPK kinase (MEK)‐independent but PKC‐dependent pathway in rat‐1 fibroblasts. ONOO‐mediated ERK1/2 phosphorylation was not blocked by MEK inhibitors PD98059 and U0126. Furthermore, no increase in MEK phosphorylation was detected upon ONOO treatment. Staurosporine was used to investigate whether protein kinase C (PKC) is involved. This was confirmed by down‐regulation of PKC by phorbol‐12,13‐dibutyrate, which resulted in significant reduction of ERK1/2 phosphorylation by ONOO, implying that activation of ERK by ONOO depends on activation of PKC. Indeed, PKCα and ϵ were activated upon ONOO exposure. When cells were treated with ONOO in a calcium‐free buffer, no activation of PKCα was detected. Concomitantly, a reduction of ERK1/2 phosphorylation was observed suggesting that calcium was required for translocation of PKCα and ERK phosphorylation by ONOO. Indeed, ONOO exposure resulted in increased cytosolic calcium, which depended on the presence of extracellular calcium. Finally, data using Gö6976, an inhibitor of calcium‐dependent PKC activation, implied that ONOO‐mediated ERK1/2 phosphorylation depends on activation of a calcium‐dependent PKC.

This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit: