Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure estimation: How confident are anesthesiologists?*
- 1 June 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 30 (6) , 1197-1203
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200206000-00003
Abstract
The pulmonary artery catheter is a controversial device, and randomized evaluation of its effectiveness has been demanded. Accurate estimation of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure is important for optimal use of the pulmonary artery catheter. Anesthesiologists use the pulmonary artery catheter frequently but have not been surveyed about confidence in pulmonary artery occlusion pressure estimation. Our objective was to determine the ability of practicing cardiovascular anesthesiologists to estimate pulmonary artery occlusion pressure accurately and measure their confidence in this estimate. Cross-sectional survey. All academic and community hospitals in English-speaking Eastern Canada and selected centers in Western Canada and the United States. Cardiovascular anesthesiologists. None. We measured agreement with expert-defined timing of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure estimation, estimation of a sample pulmonary artery occlusion pressure trace, and management of a hypothetical clinical complication (air embolism). Seventy-seven percent of 345 anesthesiologists responded. Agreement about the optimal timing of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure estimation (89%) and the management of air embolism (85%) was near expectations (expected 90%). However, the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure waveform was interpreted accurately by only 61%, whereas 28% disagreed and 11% were uncertain. Significant positive associations (p = .016) between continuing medical education items and accurate interpretation were observed. Estimation of a sample pulmonary artery occlusion pressure trace by practicing anesthesiologists was in only modest agreement with expert assessment and published standards. Anesthesiologists demonstrated substantially less confidence in pulmonary artery occlusion pressure estimation than in the optimal timing of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure estimation. Before the effectiveness of the pulmonary artery catheter in clinical care can be systematically assessed, efforts are needed to enhance accuracy and consistency of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure estimation.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intensive care physicians' insufficient knowledge of right-heart catheterization at the bedsideCritical Care Medicine, 1997
- Assessment of critical care nursesʼ knowledge of the pulmonary artery catheterCritical Care Medicine, 1994
- Preoperative Optimization of Cardiovascular Hemodynamics Improves Outcome in Peripheral Vascular SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 1991
- Pitfalls in interpretation of pulmonary artery catheter dataJournal of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, 1989
- Physician ratings of appropriate indications for three procedures: theoretical indications vs indications used in practice.American Journal of Public Health, 1989
- The effect of comorbidity on appropriateness ratings for two gastrointestinal proceduresJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988
- Assessing hemodynamic status in critically ill patients: Do physicians use clinical information optimally?Journal of Critical Care, 1987
- Misinterpretation of pressure measurements from the pulmonary artery catheterCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1986
- A Method for the Detailed Assessment of the Appropriateness of Medical TechnologiesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1986
- Clinical evaluation compared to pulmonary artery catheterization in the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1984