The Paradox of Case Study
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cambridge Journal of Education
- Vol. 26 (2) , 225-240
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764960260206
Abstract
One of the advantages cited for case study research is its uniqueness, its capacity for understanding complexity in particular contexts. A corresponding disadvantage often cited is the difficulty of generalising from the single case. Such an observation assumes a polarity and stems from a particular view of research. Looked at differently, from within a holistic perspective and direct perception, there is no disjunction. What we have is a paradox, which if acknowledged and explored in depth, yields both unique and universal understanding. This paper revisits this problem in case study research. It argues that, with the pressure for quantification and the growth of multi‐site case study design in policy research, the original vision and utility of case study for understanding complex educational phenomena has been clouded and thereby an opportunity diminished for new ways of knowingKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Forms of Understanding and the Future of Educational ResearchEducational Researcher, 1993
- The Profession of Educational ResearchBritish Educational Research Journal, 1993
- Validity in Qualitative ResearchEducation and Urban Society, 1987
- Thou nature art my goddess’: Naturalistic Inquiry in Educational EvaluationCambridge Journal of Education, 1981
- The Case Study Method in Social InquiryEducational Researcher, 1978
- Case‐study and the Social Philosophy of Educational ResearchCambridge Journal of Education, 1975
- Re‐thinking evaluation: Notes from the Cambridge ConferenceAuthority, Teacher Education and Educational StudiesCambridge Journal of Education, 1973
- The Conscience of Educational EvaluationTeachers College Record: the Voice of Scholarship in Education, 1972