The Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Intranasal Meningoencephaloceles
- 1 November 1992
- journal article
- case report
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
- Vol. 118 (11) , 1253-1256
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1992.01880110121021
Abstract
• We present three patients in whom the diagnosis of intranasal meningoencephalocele was made by magnetic resonance imaging. The initial clinical evaluation and computed tomographic examinations of these patients failed to distinguish between chronic inflammation and intranasal meningoencephalocele. Although both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are used to distinguish between normal, inflammatory, and neoplastic tissue in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, limitations do exist and these are the focus of our communication. A clear understanding of the efficacy of these radiographic modalities will enhance surgical planning and can preclude severe complications. (Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118:1253-1256)Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- MeningoencephalocelePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,2016
- Nasal glioma and encephalocele: two separate entitiesJournal of Neurosurgery, 1986
- Intranasal Encephalocele Masking as a Nasal Polyp in an Adult PatientJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1983
- Intranasal EncephalocelesJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1965
- Spina Bifida and Cranium BifidumNew England Journal of Medicine, 1943
- AN OPERATIVE TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN CASES OF MENINGOCELE (OR ENCEPHALOCELE) INTO THE ORBITArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1929
- BASAL HERNIAS OF THE BRAINThe Lancet Healthy Longevity, 1895