Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 32 (Supplement) , S457-S464
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200009001-00004
Abstract
AINSWORTH, B. E., D. R. BASSETT, JR., S. J. STRATH, A. M. SWARTZ, W. L. O’BRIEN, R. W. THOMPSON, D. A. JONES, C. A. MACERA, and C. D. KIMSEY. Comparison of three methods for measuring time spent in physical activity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 32, No. 9, Suppl., pp. S457–S464, 2000. Three methods for measuring time spent in daily physical activity (PA) were compared during a 21-d period among 83 adults (38 men and 45 women). Each day, participants wore a Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) monitor and completed a 1-page, 48-item PA log that reflected time spent in household, occupational, transportation, sport, conditioning, and leisure activities. Once a week, participants also completed a telephone survey to identify the number of minutes spent each week in nonoccupational walking and in moderate intensity and hard/very hard-intensity PA. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Spearman rank-order correlations. Three equations developed to compute CSA cut points for moderate and hard/very hard PA were also compared with the PA logs and PA survey. There was modest to good agreement for the time spent in different PA intensity categories between the three CSA cut point methods (r = 0.43–0.94, P < 0.001). Correlations between the CSA and PA logs ranged from r = 0.22 to r = 0.36, depending on the comparisons. Correlations between the survey items and PA logs were r = 0.26–0.54 (P < 0.01) for moderate and walking activities and r < 0.09 (P > 0.05) for hard/very hard activities. Correlations between the survey items and the CSA min per day varied according to the method used to compute the CSA intensity cut points. The results were consistent with findings from other PA validation studies that show motion sensors, PA logs, and surveys reflect PA; however, these methods do not always provide similar estimates of the time spent in resting/light, moderate, or hard/very hard PA.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the fieldMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2000
- DOES THE BRFSS ACCURATELY ASSESS ATTAINMENT OF THE US SURGEON GENERAL'S RECOMMENDED LEVELS OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY?Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1999
- EVALUATION OF A STRENGTH QUESTION IN THE BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (BRFSS)Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1999
- Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometerMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1998
- The recall of physical activity: using a cognitive model of the question-answering processMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1996
- Compendium of Physical Activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activitiesMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1993
- A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnairesMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1993
- Women Walking for Health and FitnessJAMA, 1991
- A method to assess energy expenditure in children and adultsThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1983
- The measurement of daily energy expenditure—an evaluation of some techniquesThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1980