Randomized comparison of success and adverse event rates and cost effectiveness of one long versus two short stents for treatment of long coronary narrowings
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 90 (5) , 460-464
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02514-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Medtronic
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term follow-up study of coronary reconstruction with multiple stentsAmerican Heart Journal, 1999
- Coronary-Artery Stenting Compared with Balloon Angioplasty for Restenosis after Initial Balloon AngioplastyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Procedural results and late clinical outcomes after placement of three or more stents in single coronary lesions.Circulation, 1998
- Clinical Outcome of Patients Undergoing Endoluminal Coronary Artery Reconstruction With Three or More StentsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1997
- A Comparison of Coronary-Artery Stenting with Angioplasty for Isolated Stenosis of the Proximal Left Anterior Descending Coronary ArteryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Advances in Coronary AngioplastyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- ACC expert consensus documentJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- A Comparison of Balloon-Expandable-Stent Implantation with Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- A Randomized Comparison of Coronary-Stent Placement and Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: A multilvariate statistical model to relate lesion and procedure variables to restenosisJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991