Comparison of hospitalization rates in patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with 10 days of telithromycin or clarithromycin
- 5 March 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Informa Healthcare in Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Vol. 20 (5) , 749-756
- https://doi.org/10.1185/030079904125003601
Abstract
Aims: To compare the impact on hospitalization rates and the clinical efficacy of oral telithromycin and clarithromycin treatment in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Patients and methods: Outpatients aged >18 years (n = 448) with CAP were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, multinational study and received telithromycin 800 mg once daily (n = 224) or clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily (n = 224) for 10 days. The primary outcome measure was clinical efficacy at post-therapy/test of cure (Days 17–24) in the per-protocol population. Frequency of CAP-related hospitalizations, physician visits/tests/procedures, and additional respiratory tract infection-related antibacterial use were compared by treatment group (intent to treat population) up to the late post-therapy visit (Days 31-36). Study investigators who were blinded to the treatment arm assessed whether hospital admissions were CAP related or not. Hospitalization costs (US$) associated with telithromycin and clarithromycin treatment were compared. Results: Per-protocol clinical cure rates for telithromycin and clarithromycin were statistically equivalent (88.3% [143/162] vs 88.5% [138/156] - difference: −0.2%; 95% CI: −7.8, 7.5). There were four CAP-related hospitalizations (1.8 events/100 patients) among patients treated with telithromycin vs eight (3.6 events/100 patients) among clarithromycin patients (p = 0.281). The total number of CAP-related hospital days for telithromycin and clarithromycin patients was 23 vs 64 days (10.3 vs 28.6 days/100 patients), respectively (p = 0.177). CAP-related hospitalization costs per 100 telithromycin and clarithromycin patients were $20360 vs $70567, respectively (difference: −25182; 95% CI: −49531; 9168). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that telithromycin is an effective therapy for outpatients with CAP. There were no significant differences in hospitalization rates between treatments; however, a tendency towards a numerically reduced number of hospitalizations/days required in hospital among telithromycin patients was observed. This could potentially translate into reduced hospitalization costs for telithromycin vs clarithromycin in the treatment of CAP.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of hospitalization rates in patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with telithromycin for 5 or 7 days or clarithromycin for 10 daysCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2004
- Update of Practice Guidelines for the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Immunocompetent AdultsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2003
- A Pooled Analysis of Telithromycin in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Respiratory Tract Infections in AdultsInfection, 2003
- PIN2: TELITHROMYCIN (TEL) RESULTS IN FEWER HOSPITALIZATIONS THAN AMOXICILLINCLAVULANATE (AMC) IN THE OUTPATIENT TREATMENT OF ACUTE EXACERBATIONS OF CHRONIC BRONCHITIS (AECB)Value in Health, 2003
- The KetolidesDrugs, 2002
- TelithromycinDrugs, 2001
- Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the Era of Pneumococcal ResistanceArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2000
- Community-acquired pneumoniaCurrent Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, 2000
- A Prediction Rule to Identify Low-Risk Patients with Community-Acquired PneumoniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Epidemiology of community-acquired respiratory tract infections in adults: Incidence, etiology, and impactThe American Journal of Medicine, 1985