Sources of Error in X-Ray Measurements of Residual Stress
- 1 June 1964
- journal article
- Published by AIP Publishing in Journal of Applied Physics
- Vol. 35 (6) , 1915-1917
- https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1713769
Abstract
Two sources of error are discussed. The first, due to previous plastic flow in one direction, causes an x-ray line shift whether or not a real macrostress is present, and is due to a particular distribution of microstress. The second source is stacking faults. The first error is unavoidable, but the second can be eliminated by the proper x-ray technique.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Faulting in deformed austenite and martensiteActa Metallurgica, 1963
- Residual stresses and their relaxation on the surfaces of sections cut from plastically deformed steel specimensJournal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section C: Engineering and Instrumentation, 1963
- Measurements of stacking-fault probabilities in bulk specimensPhilosophical Magazine, 1963
- Diffraction from Layer Faults in bcc and fcc StructuresJournal of Applied Physics, 1962
- X-ray studies of deformed metalsProgress in Metal Physics, 1959
- A stress-strain curve for the atomic lattice of mild steel in compressionProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1942
- A stress-strain curve for the atomic lattice of ironProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1941