Reassessing Brand Loyalty, Price Sensitivity, and Merchandising Effects on Consumer Brand Choice
- 1 July 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics
- Vol. 13 (3) , 281-289
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1995.10524602
Abstract
This article reports the results of an empirical study of household brand choices over four scanner-panel data sets. The study uses a random-effects, autocorrelated, logistic regression model. The analysis presents evidence that the brand-choice process is not zero-order. In addition, the influence of in-store displays and feature advertisements on switching is shown to be about two to three times more effective than estimates obtained from previous studies. Finally, the analysis indicates systematic differences between frequent and infrequent buyers of products in terms of their sensitivity to price, displays, and feature advertising.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modeling Multiple Sources of Heterogeneity in Multinomial Logit Models: Methodological and Managerial IssuesMarketing Science, 1993
- Investigating Purchase Incidence, Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Decisions of HouseholdsMarketing Science, 1993
- The Future of Research in Marketing: Marketing ScienceJournal of Marketing Research, 1993
- Promotion Has a Negative Effect on Brand Evaluations: Or Does It? Additional Disconfirming EvidenceJournal of Marketing Research, 1992
- Investigating Heterogeneity in Brand Preferences in Logit Models for Panel DataJournal of Marketing Research, 1991
- Quality Perceptions and Asymmetric Switching Between BrandsMarketing Science, 1991
- A Two-State Model of Purchase Incidence and Brand ChoiceMarketing Science, 1991
- The Effects of a Direct Mail Coupon on Brand Choice BehaviorJournal of Marketing Research, 1987
- An Investigation into the Order of the Brand Choice ProcessMarketing Science, 1984
- A Stochastic Brand Choice Framework for Econometric Modeling of Time Series Market Share BehaviorJournal of Marketing Research, 1980