Quality of life and policy analysis in arthritis
- 1 September 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 5 (3) , 173-183
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1790050310
Abstract
Problems in the American health care system have stimulated interest in cost‐effectiveness methodologies. However, there is little consensus on how to define a common unit of health outcome. Many measures used in policy studies consider only mortality and do not fully capture the significant impact of disease‐related dysfunction. The impact of conditions, such as osteoarthritis, that have little impact on mortality rates but substantial impact on functioning and well‐being may be underestimated in these analyses. In this article, we propose a measurement and policy model that is based on a theoretical conceptualization of health outcome. The model considers the impact of disease and its treatment in terms of both morbidity and mortality. The value of the model for clinical trials, population assessments, and policy analysis is reviewed. A public policy application of the model in Oregon is briefly described.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic EvaluationMedical Care, 1990
- The Quality of Well-Being ScaleMedical Care, 1989
- Generic and Disease-Specific Measures in Assessing Health Status and Quality of LifeMedical Care, 1989
- Using Composite Health Status Measures to Assess the Nation??s HealthMedical Care, 1989
- Weights for Scoring the Quality of Well-being Instrument Among Rheumatoid ArthriticsMedical Care, 1986
- Auranofin therapy and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Results of a multicenter trialThe American Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Classifying Function for Health Outcome and Quality-of-life EvaluationMedical Care, 1986
- Health-related quality of life measurement for evaluation research and policy analysis.Health Psychology, 1982
- Foundations of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Health and Medical PracticesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977