Selection Bias in theM•‐σ andM•‐LCorrelations and Its Consequences
- 1 May 2007
- journal article
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 660 (1) , 267-275
- https://doi.org/10.1086/512719
Abstract
It is common to estimate black hole abundances by using a measured correlation between black hole mass and another more easily measured observable such as the velocity dispersion or luminosity of the surrounding bulge. The correlation is used to transform the distribution of the observable into an estimate of the distribution of black hole masses. However, different observables provide different estimates: the Mbh-sigma relation predicts fewer massive black holes than does the Mbh-L relation. This is because the sigma-L relation in black hole samples currently available is inconsistent with that in the SDSS sample, from which the distributions of L or sigma are based: the black hole samples have smaller L for a given sigma or have larger sigma for a given L. This is true whether L is estimated in the optical or in the NIR. If this is a selection rather than physical effect, then the Mbh-sigma and Mbh-L relations currently in the literature are also biased from their true values. We provide a framework for describing the effect of this bias. We then combine it with a model of the bias to make an estimate of the true intrinsic relations. While we do not claim to have understood the source of the bias, our simple model is able to reproduce the observed trends. If we have correctly modeled the selection effect, then our analysis suggests that the bias in the relation is likely to be small, whereas the relation is biased towards predicting more massive black holes for a given luminosity. In addition, it is likely that the Mbh-L relation is entirely a consequence of more fundamental relations between Mbh and sigma, and between sigma and L. The intrinsic relation we find suggests that at fixed luminosity, older galaxies tend to host more massive black holes.Comment: 12 pages, 7 figures. Accepted by ApJ. We have added a figure showing that a similar bias is also seen in the K-band. A new appendix describes the BH samples as well as the fits used in the main texKeywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- The σ-LCorrelation in Nearby Early-Type GalaxiesThe Astronomical Journal, 2007
- The Luminosities, Sizes, and Velocity Dispersions of Brightest Cluster Galaxies: Implications for Formation HistoryThe Astronomical Journal, 2007
- The SAURON project--IV. The mass-to-light ratio, the virial mass estimator and the Fundamental Plane of elliptical and lenticular galaxiesMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2006
- Colors, Magnitudes, and Velocity Dispersions in Early-Type Galaxies: Implications for Galaxy Ages and MetallicitiesThe Astronomical Journal, 2005
- The Galaxy Luminosity Function and Luminosity Density at Redshiftz= 0.1The Astrophysical Journal, 2003
- Redshift-Distance Survey of Early-Type Galaxies: Circular-Aperture PhotometryThe Astronomical Journal, 2003
- Early-type Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. II. Correlations between ObservablesThe Astronomical Journal, 2003
- Early-Type Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. I. The SampleThe Astronomical Journal, 2003
- The Cosmic Density of Massive Black Holes from Galaxy Velocity DispersionsThe Astronomical Journal, 2002
- Redshift-Distance Survey of Early-Type Galaxies. I. The ENEAR[CLC]c[/CLC] Cluster SampleThe Astronomical Journal, 2002