Ineffective Therapy and Delayed Transport
- 1 December 1989
- journal article
- controversy
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
- Vol. 4 (2) , 129-130
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x00029903
Abstract
The administration of IV fluids to traumatized patients in the field at first seems like a motherhood issue: It can't do any harm and might do some good, so why not use it? This rationale has resulted in its inclusion in prehospital trauma care since the advent of paramedic systems in this country approximately 15 years ago; yet it remains unproven. There are no convincing data in the literature to support the efficacy for the administration of IV fluids in the prehospital setting.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Advanced Life Support Appropriate for Victims of Motor Vehicle Accidents: The South Carolina Highway Trauma ProjectPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1988
- Prehospital advanced life support vs “Scoop and Run” in trauma managementAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1987
- Prehospital advanced trauma life support for critical blunt trauma victimsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1987
- Early emergency care study: the potential and benefits of advanced prehospital care.BMJ, 1987
- Prehospital Intravenous Fluid Therapy: Physiologic Computer ModellingPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1986
- Prehospital Advanced Trauma Life Support for Critical Penetrating Wounds to the Thorax and AbdomenPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1985
- Prehospital Stabilization of Critically Injured PatientsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1985
- The Importance of Prompt Transport in Salvage of Patients with Penetrating Heart WoundsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1982
- Evaluation of resuscitation from cardiopulmonary arrest by paramedicsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1980
- Catheterization of the Heart in Man with Use of a Flow-Directed Balloon-Tipped CatheterNew England Journal of Medicine, 1970