Patient Choices, Family Interests, and Physician Obligations
- 1 March 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Project MUSE in Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
- Vol. 4 (1) , 27-46
- https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.0.0065
Abstract
Recent articles in biomedical ethics have begun to explore both the relevance of family interests in treatment decisions and the resultant ramifications for physicians' obligations to patients. This article addresses two important questions regarding physicians' obligations vis-a-vis family interests: (1) What should a physician do when the exercise of patient autonomy threatens to negate the patient's moral obligations to other family members? (2) Does respect for patient autonomy typically require efforts on the part of physicians to keep patients' treatment decisions from being influenced by family considerations? A series of clarifications about the concept of autonomy is also presented.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Taking Families SeriouslyHastings Center Report, 1992
- The Ideal of Shared Decision Making Between Physicians and PatientsKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1991
- What about the Family?Hastings Center Report, 1990
- A History and Theory of Informed Consent. By Ruth R. Faden and Tom L. Beauchamp (with Nancy M. P. King) (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. xv, 392p. $29.95).American Political Science Review, 1988
- The physician-patient relationship: Models and criticismsTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 1987
- Why Doctors Should InterveneHastings Center Report, 1982
- Free AgencyThe Journal of Philosophy, 1975
- Informed (but Uneducated) ConsentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1972
- Four Essays on LibertyThe Western Political Quarterly, 1971