Measuring physical strain during ambulation with accelerometry
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- applied sciences
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 32 (8) , 1462-1471
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200008000-00015
Abstract
BUSSMANN, J. B. J., I. HARTGERINK, L. H. V. VAN DER WOUDE, and H. J. STAM. Measuring physical strain during ambulation with accelerometry. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 1462–1471, 2000. Purpose To study the feasibility of ambulatory accelerometry in the evaluation of physical strain in walking at different speeds and different levels of economy. Methods Twelve able-bodied subjects performed a walking test on a treadmill with increasing walking speed. After a 6-wk period, these measurements were repeated, with an additional test of perturbed walking. Motility (the intensity of body segment movements, measured with accelerometry), heart rate, and oxygen uptake were simultaneously recorded. Feasibility was determined by comparing motility with percentage heart rate reserve (%HRR), using oxygen uptake (V̇O2) as reference. The relation with oxygen uptake, the sensitivity to change when walking speed increased and gait was perturbed, and intrasubject and intersubject variability were studied. Results Walking with increasing walking speed resulted in a higher pooled r2 value (0.91) and a lower residual standard deviation (1.44 mL·kg−1·min−1) for the motility-V̇O2 relation than for the %HRR-V̇O2 relation (0.84 and 1.92 mL·kg−1·min−1, respectively). Furthermore, the motility-V̇O2 relation for this part of the protocol showed lowest interindividual differences. The sensitivity to changes due to an increase in walking speed, and the test-retest reliability were the highest for motility. Walking with a brace resulted in a lower pooled r2 value for the motility-V̇O2 relation than for the %HRR-V̇O2 relation (0.31 and 0.67, respectively); the sensitivity to changes due to walking with a brace was lower for motility than for %HRR. Conclusion Compared with heart rate, accelerometry allows accurate measurement with little error in any able-bodied individual, without the need for individual calibration. The response of motility to changes and differences in economy in patients requires further study.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantification of physical activities by means of ambulatory accelerometry: A validation studyPsychophysiology, 1998
- Validity and Reliability of Measurements Obtained With an “Activity Monitor” in People With and Without a Transtibial AmputationPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1998
- Validity of heart rate, pedometry, and accelerometry for predicting the energy cost of children’s activitiesJournal of Applied Physiology, 1998
- Ambulatory accelerometry to quantify motor behaviour in patients after failed back surgery: a validation studyPain, 1998
- Physical capacity and physical strain in persons with tetraplegia; The role of sport activitySpinal Cord, 1996
- Daily physical activity assessment: comparison between movement registration and doubly labeled waterJournal of Applied Physiology, 1996
- The Relation Between Power Output, Oxygen Uptake and Heart Rate in Male AthletesInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 1994
- Use of limb movement sensors as indicators of the level of everyday physical activity in chronic congestive heart failureThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Exercise testing and training of persons with dysvascular amputation: Safety and efficacy of arm ergometryArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1992
- A Simple Activity Measure for Use with Ambulatory SubjectsPsychophysiology, 1990