Doubt and belief in physicians’ ability to prognosticate during critical illness: The perspective of surrogate decision makers
- 1 August 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 36 (8) , 2341-2347
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e318180ddf9
Abstract
Although discussing a prognosis is a duty of physicians caring for critically ill patients, little is known about surrogate decision-makers’ beliefs about physicians’ ability to prognosticate. We sought to determine: 1) surrogates’ beliefs about whether physicians can accurately prognosticate for critically ill patients; and 2) how individuals use prognostic information in their role as surrogate decision-makers. Multicenter study in intensive care units of a public hospital, a tertiary care hospital, and a veterans’ hospital. We conducted semistructured interviews with 50 surrogate decision-makers of critically ill patients. We analyzed the interview transcripts using grounded theory methods to inductively develop a framework to describe surrogates’ beliefs about physicians’ ability to prognosticate. Validation methods included triangulation by multidisciplinary analysis and member checking. Overall, 88% (44 of 50) of surrogates expressed doubt about physicians’ ability to prognosticate for critically ill patients. Four distinct themes emerged that explained surrogates’ doubts about prognostic accuracy: a belief that God could alter the course of the illness, a belief that predicting the future is inherently uncertain, prior experiences where physicians’ prognostications were inaccurate, and experiences with prognostication during the patient's intensive care unit stay. Participants also identified several factors that led to belief in physicians’ prognostications, such as receiving similar prognostic estimates from multiple physicians and prior experiences with accurate prognostication. Surrogates’ doubts about prognostic accuracy did not prevent them from wanting prognostic information. Instead, most surrogate decision-makers view physicians’ prognostications as rough estimates that are valuable in informing decisions, but are not determinative. Surrogates identified the act of prognostic disclosure as a key step in preparing emotionally and practically for the possibility that a patient may not survive. Although many surrogate decision-makers harbor some doubt about the accuracy of physicians’ prognostications, they highly value discussions about prognosis and use the information for multiple purposes.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Language of Prognostication in Intensive Care UnitsMedical Decision Making, 2008
- The Pressure to Withhold or Withdraw Life-sustaining Therapy from Critically Ill Patients in the United StatesAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2007
- Prognostication during physician-family discussions about limiting life support in intensive care units*Critical Care Medicine, 2007
- Preparedness for the Death of a Loved One and Mental Health in Bereaved Caregivers of Patients with Dementia: Findings from the REACH StudyJournal of Palliative Medicine, 2006
- Risk communication in the clinical consultationClinical Medicine, 2005
- Communication of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care unitsIntensive Care Medicine, 2005
- Family Perceptions of Prognosis, Silence, and the “Suddenness” of DeathCulture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 2005
- Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insightBMJ, 2003
- Families looking back: One year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining supportCritical Care Medicine, 2001
- A National Survey of End-of-life Care for Critically Ill PatientsAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1998