Social Difference and Antagonism Within the 16‐19 Core Curriculum
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in British Journal of Sociology of Education
- Vol. 13 (3) , 361-373
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569920130305
Abstract
The paper considers models of the core curriculum, which it argues are inadequate as their understanding of social difference is truncated. Although these models recognise difference this is located within a pluralist framework and is implicitly viewed as an impediment that hinders equal opportunities. The effect is to normalise the white, male middle class subject and to ignore social antagonism. Skill in the core curriculum becomes technicised, and a differentiated and segmented curriculum is left in place.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Education and the Ideology of ProductionBritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 1987
- Two-Track TrainingPublished by Springer Nature ,1987
- Progressive Pedagogy and Political StruggleScreen, 1986
- Academic Studies and Technical Education: New Dimensions of an Old Struggle in the Division of KnowledgeSociology of Education, 1985
- Marxism and Schooling: The Limits of Radical Discourse*Educational Theory, 1984
- Schooling for the Dole?Published by Springer Nature ,1984
- Beyond Progressive EducationPublished by Springer Nature ,1983
- ’Technical Culture’ and Technical Education in France: a consideration of the work of Claude Grignon and its relevance to British further education curriculaBritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 1982
- Social and Technical Relations: the case of further educationBritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 1981
- Sex and Skill: Notes towards a Feminist EconomicsFeminist Review, 1980