PTP is Meaningless, T-PTP is Contradictory: A Reply to Trueman
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Cladistics
- Vol. 14 (1) , 105-116
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1998.tb00206.x
Abstract
- The T-PTP test for monophyly can attribute significance to entirely unsupported groups and even to both of two contradictory alternatives. The method of evaluating "support" after replacing selected groups of terminals with reconstructed ancestors has similar drawbacks. The proposed placement of Onychophora among Arthropoda is unsupported by 12S data, and strongly refuted by other evidence. Attempts to justify T-PTP on Popperian grounds rest entirely on misunderstanding Popper's ideas. The PTP test assesses neither Popperian corroboration nor statistical confidence of phylogenetic conclusions. It can attribute high significance to data that support no resolved grouping. Efforts to salvage PTP by proposing new interpretations share the weakness that none of the proposed interpretations generally holds. None of these methods seems useful in phylogenetic.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- PERMUTATION TESTS AND OUTGROUPSCladistics, 1996
- PARSIMONY JACKKNIFING OUTPERFORMS NEIGHBOR‐JOININGCladistics, 1996
- BRANCH SUPPORT AND TREE STABILITYCladistics, 1994
- Length Differences and Topology-dependent Tests: a Response to Källersjö et al.Cladistics, 1994
- PermutationsCladistics, 1994
- Arthropod Phylogeny: a Combined ApproachCladistics, 1993
- Randomization Confounded: a Response to CarpenterCladistics, 1993
- Evidence from 12 S Ribosomal RNA Sequences that Onychophorans Are Modified ArthropodsScience, 1992
- DNA phylogeny of the extinct marsupial wolfNature, 1989
- THE LIMITS OF AMINO ACID SEQUENCE DATA IN ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENETIC RECONSTRUCTIONEvolution, 1988