Concepts, labeling procedures, and design of cell proliferation studies relating to carcinogenesis.
- 1 December 1993
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Environmental Health Perspectives in Environmental Health Perspectives
- Vol. 101 (suppl 5) , 59-65
- https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.93101s559
Abstract
Chemicals may induce cell proliferation directly as mitogens or indirectly via cell death with subsequent proliferation to replace lost cells. Chemically induced proliferation has been demonstrated to play a role in the carcinogenic process. A wide range of procedures and techniques are currently being used to define the quantitative relationship between the extent and duration of chemically induced cell proliferation and carcinogenic potential in different species and target organs. However, a limited database and nonstandard protocols and procedures for measuring cell proliferation have made it difficult to compare results between laboratories. Comparison of frequencies of S phase between control and treated animals is the most commonly used end point in cell proliferation studies and may be regarded as an indirect indication of a proliferative response. This response can be ascertained as labeling indexes (LI; percentage of cells in S phase) after the administration of the DNA precursor labels (tritiated thymidine; 3H-TdR; bromodeoxyuridine, BrdU) or through immunostaining of the endogenous cell replication marker, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Both approaches are applicable to tissue sections. An important issue in the design of experimental studies for measuring LI is determining how and when to investigate proliferative responses in relation to the chemical treatment regimen. Variables to consider when designing cell proliferation studies include the animal's age, chemical dose and method of treatment, choice and dose of label, time and length that the label is administered, and methods of quantitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mitogenic stimulation of hepatocellular proliferation in rodents following 1,4-dichlorobenzene administrationCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1992
- Evaluation of genotoxicity, pathological lesions, and cell proliferation in livers of rats and mice treated with furanEnvironmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 1992
- Liver tumor promotion: Effect of phenobarbital on EGF and protein kinase C signal transduction and transforming growth factor-?1 expressionDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1991
- Scientific Concepts, Value, and Significance of Chemical Carcinogenesis StudiesAnnual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 1991
- Dose response of hepatic and renal DNA synthetic rates to continuous exposure of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) via slow-release pellets or osmotic minipumps in male B6C3F1 mice.Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, 1991
- Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunolocalization in paraffin sections: An index of cell proliferation with evidence of deregulated expression in some, neoplasmsThe Journal of Pathology, 1990
- Measurement of chemically induced cell proliferation in rodent liver and kidney: a comparison of 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine and[3H]thymidine administered by injection or osmotic pumpCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1990
- Immunohistochemical markers of cellular proliferation: achievements, problems and prospectsCell Proliferation, 1990
- Potential Pitfalls of [3H]Thymidine Techniques to Measure Cell ProliferationCell Proliferation, 1981
- The sequential analysis of liver cancer inductionBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer, 1980