Comparison of two screen-film combinations in contact and magnification mammography: detectability of microcalcifications.
- 1 September 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 168 (3) , 657-659
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.168.3.3406394
Abstract
A new dual-screen, dual-emulsion-film combination that allows a decrease in radiation dose of approximately 66% was compared with a widely used single-screen, single-emulsion-film system in contact and magnification mammography. Clustered microcalcifications randomly superimposed on a breast phantom were detected, and the location and number of individual calcifications were determined by four observers. The detectability of calcifications, determined with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis area, was 0.92 for magnification and 0.82 for contact mammography with the single-emulsion-film system, compared with 0.84 and 0.72, respectively, with the dual-emulsion-film system. More clusters were correctly located and more individual calcifications were counted with magnification than with contact mammography. The dual-emulsion-film system with the magnification technique performs as well as the single-emulsion-film system with the contact technique, while retaining a decrease in required dose of approximately 40%.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mammographic dual-screen-dual-emulsion-film combination: visibility of simulated microcalcifications and effect on image contrast.Radiology, 1987
- Digital MammographyInvestigative Radiology, 1987
- Mammographic microcalcifications: detection with xerography, screen-film, and digitized film display.Radiology, 1986
- Mammographic detectability of breast microcalcificationsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1982
- The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology, 1982