Grinding-Tool Design as Conditioned by Land-Use Pattern
- 1 April 1993
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 58 (2) , 286-305
- https://doi.org/10.2307/281971
Abstract
The form in which archaeologists recover artifacts is the product of intentional design, use modification, and postdepositional alteration. Analysis of grinding tools, from small prehistoric sites in southwestern New Mexico, indicates the effects of intentional design and use modification on artifact form. These variables of technological behavior are considered in relation to anticipated, regular occupation of sites. Distinguishing the extent to which site visits are anticipated and regular can enhance our understanding of how places and resources were used and how land use was organized. Because grinding tools commonly remain on sites, their anticipated reuse signals anticipated reuse of the places where they occur. While characteristics of intentional design positively correlate with regularity of site occupation, the effects of use modification do not.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- On Manos, Metates, and the History of Site OccupationsAmerican Antiquity, 1991
- Technological Organization and Hunter-Gatherer Land Use: A California ExampleAmerican Antiquity, 1991
- Early agriculture and sedentism in the American Southwest: Evidence and interpretationsJournal of World Prehistory, 1988
- The Three Sides of a BifaceAmerican Antiquity, 1988
- The Optimal Design of Hunting Weapons: Maintainability or ReliabilityAmerican Antiquity, 1986
- Technological Efficiency and Tool CurationAmerican Antiquity, 1986
- Hafting and Retooling: Effects on the Archaeological RecordAmerican Antiquity, 1982
- Organization and Formation Processes: Looking at Curated TechnologiesJournal of Anthropological Research, 1979
- The Size Effect: An Explanation of Variability in Surface Artifact Assemblage ContentAmerican Antiquity, 1978
- Technique and methodology in microwear studies: A critical reviewWorld Archaeology, 1974