Why are Married Men Working So Much?
- 1 November 2005
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
We document a negative trend in the leisure of men married to women aged 25-45, relative to that of their wives, and a positive trend in relative housework. Taken together, these trends rule out a popular class of labor supply models in which unitary households maximize the sum of the spouse's utility. We develop a simple bargaining model of marriage, divorce and allocations of leisure-time and housework. According to the model, a rise in women's relative wage will reduce husband's leisure and marriage rates when the quality of single life is relatively high for women. Calibration to US data shows the trend in relative wages explains most of the trend in relative leisure and about a third of the trend in housework, while the simultaneous trend in home-durables prices explains the balance of the housework trend.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- WHY ARE MARRIED WOMEN WORKING SO MUCH?Journal of Demographic Economics, 2015
- Income taxation and marital decisionsReview of Economic Dynamics, 2005
- Selection, Investment, and Women's Relative Wages Since 1975Published by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2005
- Individual Rather Than Household Euler Equations: Identification and Estimation of Individual Preferences Using Household DataSSRN Electronic Journal, 2005
- Marriage and Divorce since World War II: Analyzing the Role of Technological Progress on the Formation of HouseholdsPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2004
- More on Marriage, Fertility, and the Distribution of Income*International Economic Review, 2003
- Why Do Women Wait? Matching, Wage Inequality, and the Incentives for Fertility DelayReview of Economic Dynamics, 2002
- Swimming Upstream: Trends in the Gender Wage Differential in the 1980sJournal of Labor Economics, 1997
- Nash-Bargained Household Decisions: Toward a Generalization of the Theory of DemandInternational Economic Review, 1981