The critique of vernacular discourse
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Monographs
- Vol. 62 (1) , 19-46
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759509376346
Abstract
Critical rhetoricians should, by criticizing vernacular discourse, follow the path of those who have discussed the rhetoric of the oppressed. The critique of powerful discourse has broad “historical” impact and therefore has been the primary mode of critique within rhetorical criticism. In addition to the critique of widely disseminated texts, critics should examine texts that profoundly influence vernacular communities and communitas. We conceptualize how a study of vernacular discourse could be carried out by defining vernacular, describing the critique of vernacular discourse, explaining the purpose of such criticism, and illustrating our approach through a brief study of one example of vernacular discourse: World War II representations of women in the Pacific Citizen, a Japanese American newspaper.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Commitment totelos—a sustained critical rhetoricCommunication Monographs, 1992
- Rethinking ethnography: Towards a critical cultural politicsCommunication Monographs, 1991
- Between myth and history: Enacting time in Native American protest rhetoricQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1991
- Critical rhetoric in a postmodern worldQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1991
- Finding a Horizon and telos: The challenge to critical rhetoricQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1991
- Critical rhetoric and postmodern theoryQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1991
- Native American rhetoric: Dancing in the shadows of the ghost danceQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1990
- Critical rhetoric: Theory and praxisCommunication Monographs, 1989
- Constitutive rhetoric: The case of thepeuple québécoisQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1987
- The rhetoric of black power: A street‐level interpretationQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1969