Cetuximab preclinical antitumor activity (monotherapy and combination based) is not predicted by relative total or activated epidermal growth factor receptor tumor expression levels
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
- Vol. 5 (1) , 104-113
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.mct-05-0259
Abstract
Although Erbitux (cetuximab) has proven therapeutic benefit in the clinical setting, the molecular determinants predicting responsiveness to this agent are still not very well understood. Here, we assessed the relationship between basal total and activated (pY1068) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) levels in a tumor and the responsiveness to cetuximab monotherapy or combination-based treatment using human xenograft models. Cetuximab treatment alone (0.25–1 mg/mouse/injection, q3d, i.p.) effectively delayed the growth of GEO and L2987 tumors by a minimum of 10 days corresponding to log cell kill values of ≥1.0. Borderline activity was seen in the A549 and WiDr xenografts. However, cetuximab failed to show any significant antitumor activity in the HT29, HCT116, LOVO, Colo205, LX-1, HCC70, and N87 models. All of the studied tumors had detectable yet variable levels of EGFR. For combination regimens, cetuximab (1 mg/mouse/injection, q3dx5, i.p.) and cisplatin (4.5 mg/kg/injection, q3dx5, i.v.) proved to be significantly more efficacious than individual monotherapies in the cisplatin-refractory yet cetuximab-responsive GEO tumor model (P < 0.001). However, no therapeutic enhancement was observed in the cisplatin and cetuximab weakly responsive A549 xenograft. Similarly, combinations of CPT-11 (48 mg/kg/injection, q3dx5, i.v.) with cetuximab (1 mg/mouse/injection, q3dx5, i.p.) failed to show any improvements over individual monotherapies in the cetuximab resistant/weakly responsive HT29, A549, and WiDr models. We conclude that preclinical activity associated with cetuximab monotherapy does not correlate directly with relative basal levels of total or activated (pY1068) EGFR in a tumor. Moreover, robust single-agent activity by cetuximab may be the best predictor for this agent to potentiate chemotherapy-mediated antitumor activities. [Mol Cancer Ther 2006;5(1):104–13]Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differential Effects of Gefitinib and Cetuximab on Non–small-cell Lung Cancers Bearing Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor MutationsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Erlotinib in Lung Cancer — Molecular and Clinical Predictors of OutcomeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from “never smokers” and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinibProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004
- C225 antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody enhances the efficacy of docetaxel chemoradiotherapyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2004
- EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib TherapyScience, 2004
- Activating Mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Underlying Responsiveness of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer to GefitinibNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- EGFR and cancer prognosisPublished by Elsevier ,2001
- Combined Modality Therapy of A431 Human Epidermoid Cancer Using Anti-EGFr Antibody C225 and RadiationCancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals, 1999
- Imaging of Human Tumor Xenografts With an Indium-111-Labeled Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal AntibodyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1989
- A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly-censored samplesBiometrika, 1965