The Cost of Operating Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)
- 1 June 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Academic Medicine
- Vol. 78 (6) , 638-644
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200306000-00019
Abstract
Recent reports have claimed that institutional review boards (IRBs) are underfunded, yet little is known about the costs of operating IRBs. This study estimated the costs for operating high-volume and low-volume IRBs. IRB costs were calculated from published summary data. Costs were standardized to reflect 2001 dollars. Total estimated costs for operating high-volume and low-volume IRBs were $770,674 and $76,626, respectively. The average cost per action, a measure of economic efficiency, was lower for high-volume IRBs ($277 per action) than it was for low-volume IRBs ($799 per action). Although high-volume IRBs are more expensive than are low-volume IRBs in absolute terms, they are more economically efficient. Policy debates should consider the potential savings from large IRBs, perhaps by encouraging small IRBs to merge, although this may result in less local review, control, and oversight.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Role of Institutional Support in Protecting Human Research SubjectsAcademic Medicine, 2000
- Challenges to Human Subject Protections in US Medical ResearchJAMA, 1999
- Estimating the capital component of mental health care costs in the public sectorAdministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1994