In Vitro Activity of Linezolid against Key Gram-Positive Organisms Isolated in the United States: Results of the LEADER 2004 Surveillance Program
Open Access
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 49 (12) , 5024-5032
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.49.12.5024-5032.2005
Abstract
Since the approval of linezolid in 2000, sporadic reports of resistance have been given and a greater understanding of the underlying mechanisms of resistance has been gained. However, since these developments, an updated status of the in vitro activity of linezolid against gram-positive organisms from the United States has not been reported. The LEADER 2004 surveillance initiative was undertaken to obtain current and representative data on the activity of linezolid against key species, including isolates with significant resistance phenotypes. Organisms were isolated during 2004 and included 2,872 Staphylococcus aureus, 496 coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CNS), 428 Enterococcus faecalis, 196 Enterococcus faecium, and 422 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. All S. aureus isolates (54.2% oxacillin resistant) were susceptible to linezolid (MIC90 = 2 μg/ml); MIC distributions were consistent, regardless of oxacillin or multidrug resistance status. For CNS, one nonsusceptible isolate was encountered (Staphylococcus epidermidis; MIC = 32 μg/ml), but overall, the MIC90 (1 μg/ml) was lower than that obtained with S. aureus. For E. faecalis and E. faecium, 99.5% and 96.4% of isolates, respectively, were linezolid susceptible. Both species had an MIC90 of 2 μg/ml, and MIC distributions did not vary with the vancomycin susceptibility status of the populations analyzed. Linezolid nonsusceptibility was not encountered among the S. pneumoniae isolates. These findings indicate that linezolid nonsusceptibility has remained rare among staphylococci and uncommon and sporadic among enterococci. Nonetheless, careful and ongoing monitoring of the in vitro effectiveness of linezolid will be needed so that any changes to the current status may be detected as soon as possible.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antimicrobial Resistance to LinezolidClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Linezolid Resistance in SequentialStaphylococcus aureusIsolates Associated with a T2500A Mutation in the 23S rRNA Gene and Loss of a Single Copy of rRNAThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection in the Texas Prison SystemClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Quinupristin‐Dalfopristin Resistance in Gram‐Positive Bacteria: Mechanism of Resistance and EpidemiologyClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Antimicrobial Resistance Trends and Outbreak Frequency in United States HospitalsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Recombination Proficiency Influences Frequency and Locus of Mutational Resistance to Linezolid in Enterococcus faecalisAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2003
- Linezolid in vitro: mechanism and antibacterial spectrumJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2003
- Factors Associated with Relative Rates of Antimicrobial Resistance amongStreptococcus pneumoniaein the United States: Results from the TRUST Surveillance Program (1998–2002)Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Susceptibility testing with linezolid by different methods, in relation to published 'general breakpoints': J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 48: 452-454Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2001
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Key Bloodstream Bacterial Isolates: Electronic Surveillance with The Surveillance Network Database‐‐USAClinical Infectious Diseases, 1999