A Retrospective, Cohort-Based Survey of Patients Using Twice-Daily Indinavir + Ritonavir Combinations: Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
- Vol. 26 (3) , 218-224
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00042560-200103010-00003
Abstract
To describe the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of twice-daily indinavir + ritonavir regimens A cohort-based survey of HIV-infected patients who either used indinavir 800 mg + ritonavir 100 mg twice daily or indinavir 400 mg + ritonavir 400 mg twice daily. Data were extracted from a database of samples sent to our laboratory for measurement of indinavir + ritonavir plasma concentrations. Patient characteristics, safety, and efficacy measurements were collected by retrospective chart review. 100 Patients using 800-mg indinavir + 100-mg ritonavir twice daily and 32 patients using 400-mg indinavir + 400-mg ritonavir twice daily were eligible. Median peak and trough concentrations of indinavir were 6.8 and 0.77 mg/L in the 800/100 group and 2.6 and 0.45 mg/L in the 400/400 group. The most frequently found side effects were nausea and vomiting, which occurred in 22.1% and 34.9% of the patients in the 800/100 and the 400/400 groups, respectively. Viral load data were analyzed for patients who switched from 800-mg indinavir three times daily to one of the indinavir + ritonavir twice daily regimens. At the time of switch 63% (800/100 group) and 60% (400/400 group) had an undetectable viral load and this increased to 77% and 70%, respectively, during follow-up. Patients who switched to the 400/400 group discontinued treatment more frequently than patients who switched to the 800/100 group (70% vs. 26%, p =.008). Indinavir + ritonavir regimens show improved pharmacokinetic properties, allowing twice-daily dosing with food. Clinical data suggest that safety and efficacy is at least as good as with indinavir three-times-daily regimens without ritonavir. Prospective, comparative trials are needed to properly assess the role in HIV therapy of these twice-daily indinavir + ritonavir regimens.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adherence communication: a qualitative analysis of physician-patient dialogueAIDS, 1999
- Longer‐Term Immunologic Effects and Side Effects of Successful Antiretroviral TherapyClinical Infectious Diseases, 1999
- Simultaneous determination of the HIV-protease inhibitors indinavir, nelfinavir, saquinavir and ritonavir in human plasma by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographyJournal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications, 1999
- Urological complaints in relation to indinavir plasma concentrations in HIV-infected patientsAIDS, 1999
- Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Ritonavir and Indinavir in Healthy VolunteersAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1998
- A Pilot Study of Nevirapine, Indinavir, and Lamivudine among Patients with Advanced Human Immunodeficiency Virus Disease Who Have Had Failure of Combination Nucleoside TherapyThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1998
- Determination of indinavir, an HIV-protease inhibitor, in human plasma by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographyJournal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications, 1997
- Treatment of HIV InfectionDrug Safety, 1996
- A 24-week open-label Phase I/II evaluation of the HIV protease inhibitor MK-639 (indinavir)AIDS, 1996
- MW/Pharm, an integrated software package for drug dosage regimen calculation and therapeutic drug monitoringComputers in Biology and Medicine, 1992