Control of Dollar Spot of Creeping Bentgrass Caused by an Isolate of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa Resistant to Benzimidazole and Demethylation-Inhibitor Fungicides

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The effects of fungicides were studied on two isolates of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa that differed in fungicide sensitivity. Concentrations of benzimidazole (benomyl and thiophanate-methyl), demethylation inhibitor (fenarimol, propiconazole, and triadimefon), and nitrile (chlorothalonil) fungicides required to inhibit mycelial growth in vitro by 50 and 90% (effective concentration; EC50,90) were significantly greater for isolate S088 than for isolate S084. No differences were observed in the EC50,90 values of a pyridylaniline (fluazinam) or dicarboximide (iprodione) fungicide. In field tests conducted on creeping bentgrass, S088 had a significantly shorter incubation period than S084 in plots treated with propiconazole applied at 0.2 or 0.8 kg a.i. ha-1 in 1994 or 0.4 kg a.i. ha-1 in 1995, thiophanate-methyl applied at 1.5 or 3.0 kg a.i. ha-1 in 1994 and 1995, or a tank-mix of propiconazole and iprodione applied at 1.6 + 0.8 kg a.i. ha-1 in 1994. No differences in incubation periods occurred in plots treated with chlorothalonil or iprodione in either year, or with fluazinam in 1995 and 1996. Fewer days were required to reach 5% disease severity in turf inoculated with isolate S088, compared to isolate S084, in plots treated with propiconazole, thiophanate-methyl, or certain tank-mixes containing propiconazole, in 1994 and 1995. Several treatments, including propiconazole, thiophanate-methyl, and fluazinam, resulted in suppression of disease caused by isolate S084 to less than 5% severity for more than 21 days, while only fluazinam applied at 1.6 or 3.2 kg a.i. ha-1 provided more than 21 days of disease suppression in turf inoculated with either of the isolates tested. Slope coefficients from linear regressions between incubation period or days to 5% disease and concentrations of fungicide applied in 1996 were significantly different for isolate S084 compared to isolate S088 in plots treated with propiconazole, but not in plots treated with fluazinam.