An Informational Analysis of Active Kinesthesis as Measured by Amplitude of Movement
- 1 March 1971
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Motor Behavior
- Vol. 3 (1) , 69-77
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1971.10734894
Abstract
5 blindfolded Ss were required to make absolute judgments of the extent to which their extended right arm was voluntarily moved in the horizontal plane. The first experiment entailed the judgment of 20 different amplitudes and from these data a scale of equal discriminability was constructed for each S. From these individual scales amplitudes were selected for 5 additional absolute judgment experiments where the number of amplitudes were varied from 4 to 16. Analysis of the mean equal discriminability scale showed that kinesthetic sensitivity varied over the continuum of movements. The primary analysis of information transfer between number of amplitudes of movement and responses indicated that information transfer varied considerably over the 5 experiments with a maximum transfer of 2.48 bits occurring when 16 amplitudes were used. These results were discussed in terms of the possible cues involved in movement discrimination and whether kinesthetic cues could be used in a closed-loop model of voluntary movement control.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relations between the central Nervous System and the peripheral organsPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- Channel capacity in absolute judgment tasks: An artifact of information bias?Psychological Bulletin, 1970
- Psychophysics of active kinesthesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969
- Response feedback and learning.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- Characteristics of visual and kinesthetic memory codes.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967
- THE RELATION OF THALAMIC CELL RESPONSE TO PERIPHERAL STIMULI VARIED OVER AN INTENSIVE CONTINUUMJournal of Neurophysiology, 1963
- On the psychophysical law.Psychological Review, 1957
- The amount of information in absolute judgments.Psychological Review, 1951