Informed consent: British otolaryngologists surveyed
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Otolaryngology
- Vol. 24 (3) , 198-207
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.1999.00244.x
Abstract
A repeat postal questionnaire of British otolaryngologists has been carried out to assess changes in their practice of obtaining informed consent. The previously reported high level of good practice is maintained. Currently informed consent is more often obtained in outpatients or the preadmission clinic than it was in 1991. Consultants and specialist registrars are more involved in this process. Although there is little evidence given to support a persistent increase in a defensive approach towards gaining informed consent, there is some change in the reporting of surgical complications that may reflect an increased awareness of the concept of ‘material risk’Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The readability of currently used surgical/procedure consent forms in the United StatesSurgery, 1998
- Informed consent: patients' and junior doctors' perceptions of the consent procedureClinical Otolaryngology, 1997
- Complications and Medicolegal Aspects of Endoscopic Sinus SurgeryJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1997
- Aesthetic sequelae of septoplasty.Clinical Otolaryngology, 1997
- Chapter 1: Informed consentOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 1996
- Informed consent Consent requires a flexible approachBMJ, 1994
- Fully informed consent can be needlessly cruel.BMJ, 1993
- Who's afraid of informed consent?BMJ, 1993
- Informed consent: the assessment of two structured interview approaches compared to the current approachThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1992