Decisionmaking between Multiattribute Choice Alternatives: A Model of Spatial Shopping-Behaviour Using Conjoint Measurements
- 1 March 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Vol. 16 (3) , 377-387
- https://doi.org/10.1068/a160377
Abstract
In this paper the authors are concerned with the application of conjoint measurement models to predict consumer choice of shopping centres. First, conjoint measurement models are discussed in the context of the development of spatial shopping-models. Next, the conceptual framework underlying the model and conjoint measurement are discussed. The second part of the paper describes an application of the methodology. Conjoint measurement is used to estimate consumer utility functions and a multivariate logit model as an approximation of the unit multivariate normal distribution is used to predict the probability that a consumer will choose a particular shopping centre. The results indicate that the methodology offers a potentially valuable approach to the modelling of spatial shopping-behaviour.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Destination Choice and Processing Spatial Information: Some Empirical Tests with Alternative ConstructsEconomic Geography, 1981
- A Study of the Importance of Generalized Attributes in Shopping Choice BehaviourEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1980
- Shopping Perceptions and Preferences: A Multidimensional Attractiveness Analysis of Consumer and Entrepreneurial AttitudesEconomic Geography, 1980
- Some Extensions to Rushton's Spatial Preference Scaling ModelGeographical Analysis, 1976
- Trade-off Analysis of Consumer ValuesJournal of Marketing Research, 1974
- The Dimensions of Alternatives in Spatial Choice Processes*Geographical Analysis, 1973
- The Cognitive Structure of an Urban Shopping CenterEnvironment and Behavior, 1970
- Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurementJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1964
- Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective FunctionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1963
- A law of comparative judgment.Psychological Review, 1927