The category effect in visual search: Identification versus localization factors.
- 1 September 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie
- Vol. 34 (3) , 238-247
- https://doi.org/10.1037/h0081054
Abstract
Between-category visual search is more rapid and/or accurate, and is less dependent on display size, than within-category search. Previous accounts have stressed identification processes and have assumed that the category of a stimulus can be determined before its actual identity. The category effect was studied in humans using a 3 .times. 3 alphanumeric matrix followed by a single-item cue. Category differences between target and nontargets enhanced performance by reducing mislocation errors rather than intrusion errors. Apparently stimulus recognition requires both identification and localization in space, and the latter process, not the former, is directed by category information.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of set on categorization in visual searchPerception & Psychophysics, 1978
- Processing spatial information and the selective-masking effectPerception & Psychophysics, 1978
- Eye movements in reading and information processing.Psychological Bulletin, 1978
- Focused attention in the perception and retrieval of multidimensional stimuliPerception & Psychophysics, 1977
- Extracting identity and location information from briefly presented letter arraysPerception & Psychophysics, 1976
- The benefit of categorization in visual search: Target location without identificationPerception & Psychophysics, 1976
- The cost of categorization in visual search: Incomplete processing of targets and field itemsPerception & Psychophysics, 1976