The Physiologic Role of Pulsatile and Nonpulsatile Blood Flow
- 1 November 1967
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 95 (5) , 762-767
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1967.01330170070009
Abstract
IT is now generally accepted that blood flow is unaffected by depulsation,1-4 but there is considerable evidence that tissue function is impaired by nonpulsatile perfusion.5-7 Although there have been many interesting studies of the effects of depulsation on renal function, their results have been contradictory. Further, because extracorporeal pumping mechanisms have been used to achieve nonpulsatile flow and because of the possible limitations imposed by the preparations used, their applicability to the intact organism is uncertain. In our laboratory, we have designed a depulsation model that uses a passive, electronically controlled, pulse-shaping device installed in series with the aorta. The device is energized by the heart, rather than by an extracorporeal pump, and allows the autoregulatory mechanisms to retain their integrity. In studies4 of the systemic-physiologic effects of total and regional depulsation, we found a significant rise of 9.6% in mean aortic pressure and peripheral resistance when theKeywords
This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit:
- Changes in Renal Blood Flow, Extraction of Inulin, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Tissue Pressure and Urine Flow With Acute Alterations of Renal Artery Blood PressureAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1951