A comparison of medical induction and dilation and evacuation for second-trimester abortion
- 1 August 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 187 (2) , 393-397
- https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.123887
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Misoprostol and PregnancyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Second-trimester uterine evacuation: A comparison of intra-amniotic (15S)-15-methyl-prostaglandin F2α and intravaginal misoprostolAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999
- Abortion at 18–22 weeks by laminaria dilation and evacuationPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1999
- A five-year experience with second-trimester induced abortions: No increase in complication rate as compared to the first trimesterAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993
- Midtrimester AbortionPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1984
- MEASURES TO PREVENT CERVICAL INJURY DURING SUCTION CURETTAGE ABORTIONThe Lancet, 1983
- Midtrimester abortion by dilatation and evacuation versus intra-amniotic instillation of prostaglandin F2α: A randomized clinical trialAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1980
- Mid-Trimester Abortion by Dilatation and EvacuationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Methods of Midtrimester Abortion: Which Is Safest?International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1977