Measurement error in direct observations: a comparison of common recording methods
- 1 January 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Vol. 18 (2) , 147-150
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(80)90109-6
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- ON THE INABILITY OF INTERVAL TIME SAMPLING TO REFLECT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE DATA1Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1978
- A COMPARISON OF INDIRECT MEASURES FOR LONG‐DURATION BEHAVIORS1Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1978
- TAKING A CLOSER LOOK: TIME SAMPLING AND MEASUREMENT ERROR1Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977
- A REVIEW OF THE OBSERVATIONAL DATA‐COLLECTION AND RELIABILITY PROCEDURES REPORTED IN THE JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSISJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977
- EVALUATING INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY OF INTERVAL DATA1Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977
- CONSIDERATIONS IN THE CHOICE OF INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY ESTIMATESJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977
- A COMPARISON OF FREQUENCY, INTERVAL, AND TIME‐SAMPLING METHODS OF DATA COLLECTIONJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1976
- DIFFERENCES AMONG COMMON METHODS FOR CALCULATING INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENTJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1976
- AN EVALUATION OF TIME‐SAMPLE MEASURES OF BEHAVIOR1Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1975