Training observers to detect spontaneous deception: Effects of gender
- 1 June 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Reports
- Vol. 4 (2) , 81-89
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219109367528
Abstract
A group of observers were trained to detect deception by instructing them to focus their attention on the reliable behavioral correlates of deception (message duration, response latency, pauses, nonfluencies, adaptors, and hand gestures) and away from unreliable behavioral correlates of deception (e.g., eye contact and leg/feet gestures). Trained observers also practiced detecting deception using this behavioral information. It was predicted that compared with untrained observers, trained observers would detect deception more accurately, but that this effect would be more pronounced for males. It also was predicted that the difference between observers' actual ability to detect deception and their confidence in the accuracy of their judgments would be smaller for trained than for untrained observers. Results were consistent with the first hypothesis; whereas the means were in the predicted direction for the second hypothesis but were not significantly different.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effects of training social perceivers to detect deception from behavioral cuesCommunication Quarterly, 1990
- Female and male: Issues of gender.American Psychologist, 1989
- DECEPTION AND AROUSAL.Human Communication Research, 1985
- Learning to detect deception from three communication channelsJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 1985
- Learning to detect deception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984
- Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- SELF-MONITORING, REHEARSAL, AND DECEPTIVE COMMUNICATIONHuman Communication Research, 1983
- Machiavellianism and deception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981
- THE TRUTH-DECEPTION ATTRIBUTION: EFFECTS OF FAMILIARITY ON THE ABILITY OF OBSERVERS TO DETECT DECEPTIONHuman Communication Research, 1980
- ACCURACY OF JUDGMENTS OF DECEPTION WHEN AN INTERVIEW IS WATCHED, HEARD, AND READ1Personnel Psychology, 1968