Routine surgical follow up: do surgeons agree?
- 18 November 1995
- Vol. 311 (7016) , 1344-1345
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7016.1344
Abstract
The move to primary care led purchasing in the NHS1 is focusing attention on the role of outpatient review, especially for postoperative patients. General practitioners have questioned whether such routine reviews could be reduced, describing them as of limited clinical value and a waste of patients' time.2 Some surgeons agree, noting that most patients' postoperative problems are identified by general practitioners before their appointment.3 The limited evidence available suggests that there are indeed opportunities for change. A randomised controlled trial comparing postoperative follow up in outpatient clinics and general practice found no difference in readmission rates or mortality, and patients were equally satisfied with either method.4 The general practice option was, however, cheaper for both the patient and the …Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomized trial of immediate discharge of surgical patients to general practiceJournal of Public Health, 1994
- The future of purchasingBMJ, 1994
- What are the benefits of routine breast cancer follow-up?Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1992
- Attitudes to follow-up after uncomplicated surgery--hospital out-patients or general practitioner?1984
- Value of outpatient follow-up after curative surgery for carcinoma of the large bowel.BMJ, 1980
- A QUESTION OF NUMBERSThe Lancet, 1976