A clinical study of "consecutive" and "adaptive" testing with the revised Stanford-Binet.

1 January 1947

journal article
Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Consulting Psychology

Vol. 11 (2) , 93-103
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056579

Abstract

I. Q. ratings obtained by "consecutive" (standard) testing and "adaptive" (modified) testing on Form L of the Revised Stanford-Binet Scale were compared on 630 cases. When applied to "total populations" or to very well adjusted cases the two methods yield comparable results. For poorly adjusted individuals the "adaptive" method yields higher I.Q. ratings which appear to be more valid for the cases studied. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)

Keywords

PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS
METHOD OF PRESENTATION
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
PRESENTATION METHOD
STANFORD-BINET
TESTS (BY NAME)
STANFORD-BINET TEST
ADAPTIVE TESTING

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: