Beef production from grass and silage with autumn-born calves. 1. The influence of grazing intensity on efficiency of herbage utilization and live-weight gain of cattle
- 1 August 1970
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Animal Science
- Vol. 12 (3) , 433-442
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003356100028981
Abstract
SUMMARY: 1. Two experiments are described in which groups of 12 autumn-born calves were strip-grazed at different intensities. In Experiment 1 (1966), ‘standard’ and ‘high’ grazing intensities were compared. In Experiment 2 (1967), ‘standard’ and ‘low’ intensities were compared. In both experiments the same meadow fescue—ryegrass ley provided 0·24 ha per head for grazing and conservation; herbage surplus to grazing requirements was conserved as silage.2. The grazing season was divided into three parts according to the type of grazing, and estimates were made of daily herbage allowances, herbage quality, efficiency of herbage utilization and the live-weight gain of the cattle.3. Grazing intensity was regulated by controlling daily herbage allowances by strip-grazing. Within grazing seasons, differences in grazing intensity had little effect on the digestibility of the herbage dry matter on offer. Dead herbage accumulation was low (10%) in the early and late parts of the season, but rose to 25% in mid-season.4. The efficiency of herbage utilization was estimated in three ways: from sample cuts of herbage on offer and refused; from measurements of herbage intake; and from feeding standards for maintenance and gain. Efficiency was highest for the ‘high’ group of Experiment 1 and lowest for the ‘low’ group of Experiment 2. The validity of efficiency estimates is discussed in relation to measurements of pasture yield, herbage intake and the assessment of the nutrient requirements of growing cattle.5. Live-weight gain over the whole season was 0·59 and 0·89 kg/head per day for the ‘high’ and ‘standard’ groups of Experiment 1, respectively. In Experiment 2, the ‘low’ and ‘standard’ groups gained weight at 0·95 and 0·84 kg/head per day, respectively.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- AN EVALUATION OF AN ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENT FOR PASTURE YIELD ESTIMATION. 2. Use with double sampling for regression estimationGrass and Forage Science, 1969
- AN EVALUATION OF AN ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENT FOR PASTURE YIELD ESTIMATION. Part I. General RelationshipsGrass and Forage Science, 1968
- The effects of grazing intensity on herbage consumption and animal production: II. Longer-term effects in strip-grazed dairy cowsThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1967
- The relationship between live-weight and herbage intake in grazing cattleAnimal Science, 1967
- Feed intake of grazing cattle. IV. A study with milk cows of the influence of pasture restriction combined with supplementary feeding on production per animal and per acreAnimal Science, 1966
- GRASSLAND RECORDING. III. A REAPPRAISAL OE THE USE OE LIVESTOCK AND STARCH-EQUIVALENT STANDARDS IN ASSESSING THE UTILIZED PRODUCTION FROM GRASSLANDGrass and Forage Science, 1964
- Effect of pasture availability and shearing stress on herbage intake of grazing sheepAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1963
- AN ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENT FOR PASTURE YIELD ESTIMATIONGrass and Forage Science, 1962
- The feed intake of grazing cattle. II. The influence of size of animal on feed intakeAnimal Production, 1961
- The influence of seasonal intensity of stocking on the live-weight increase from a swardProceedings of the British Society of Animal Production, 1956