Phase III Postoperative Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy Compared With Radical Prostatectomy Alone in pT3 Prostate Cancer With Postoperative Undetectable Prostate-Specific Antigen: ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95
Top Cited Papers
- 20 June 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 27 (18) , 2924-2930
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.18.9563
Abstract
Purpose: Local failure after radical prostatectomy (RP) is common in patients with cancer extending beyond the capsule. Two randomized trials demonstrated an advantage for adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) compared with a wait-and-see policy. We conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial to compare RP followed by immediate RT with RP alone for patients with pT3 prostate cancer and an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after RP.Methods: After RP, 192 men were randomly assigned to a wait-and-see policy, and 193 men were assigned to immediate postoperative RT. Eligible patients had pT3 pN0 tumors. Patients who did not achieve an undetectable PSA after RP were excluded from treatment according to random assignment (n = 78; 20%). Of the remaining 307 patients, 34 patients on the RT arm did not receive RT and five patients on the wait-and-see arm received RT. Therefore, 114 patients underwent RT and 154 patients were treated with a wait-and-see policy. The primary end point was biochemical progression-free survival.Results: Biochemical progression-free survival after 5 years in patients with undetectable PSA after RP was significantly improved in the RT group (72%; 95% CI, 65% to 81%; v 54%, 95% CI, 45% to 63%; hazard ratio = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.79; P = .0015). On univariate analysis, Gleason score more than 6 and less than 7, PSA before RP, tumor stage, and positive surgical margins were predictors of outcome. The rate of grade 3 to 4 late adverse effects was 0.3%.Conclusion: Adjuvant RT for pT3 prostate cancer with postoperatively undetectable PSA significantly reduces the risk of biochemical progression. Further follow-up is needed to assess the effect on metastases-free and overall survival.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predominant Treatment Failure in Postprostatectomy Patients Is Local: Analysis of Patterns of Treatment Failure in SWOG 8794Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Percutaneous radiotherapy for low-risk prostate cancer: options for 2007World Journal of Urology, 2007
- Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Pathologically Advanced Prostate CancerJAMA, 2006
- Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of Patients Presenting with Biochemical Progression after Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy for Pathologically Organ-Confined Prostate CancerUrologia Internationalis, 2006
- Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy—long-term recurrence-free survival rates for localized prostate cancerWorld Journal of Urology, 2006
- DO MARGINS MATTER? THE PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENSJournal of Urology, 2005
- Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911)The Lancet, 2005
- CANCER PROGRESSION AND SURVIVAL RATES FOLLOWING ANATOMICAL RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY IN 3,478 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS: LONG-TERM RESULTSJournal of Urology, 2004
- State T1–2 prostate cancer: A multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1997
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958