A randomized trial of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis with and without vancomycin in organ transplant patients
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Transplantation
- Vol. 13 (3) , 245-252
- https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-0012.1999.130305.x
Abstract
Gram-positive organisms, including vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), have emerged as major pathogens on the organ transplant service at our institution. We hypothesized that our use of vancomycin as part of routine surgical prophylaxis increased the risk of VRE colonization and infection; conversely, there was concern that failure to use vancomycin prophylaxis would increase peri-operative morbidity due to gram-positive organisms.Renal transplant recipients (n = 88) were randomized to receive either a) vancomycin/ceftriaxone or b) cefazolin; and pancreas transplants (n = 24) to receive either a) vancomycin/gentamicin or b) cefazolin/gentamicin. Stool samples or rectal swabs were obtained for culture for enterococci within 24 h of transplantation and weekly while hospitalized.Enterococci were isolated on stool culture from 38 (34%) of 102 patients at the time of transplantation; 4 (11%) of the isolates were VRE. The percentage of patients who subsequently acquired VRE was low (1-7% per wk) but remained constant during hospitalization. There was no association between new VRE detection and vancomycin use for either prophylactic or therapeutic purposes. Forty-four patients (39%) had a post-operative infection with 46% of these infections due to gram-positive organisms; rates were unaffected by prophylactic vancomycin use. Pancreas transplant patients who did not receive vancomycin prophylaxis had a significantly longer initial hospitalization (p = 0.03); however, differences were not statistically significant when total length of stay (LOS) within the first 90 d of transplantation was compared.Vancomycin surgical prophylaxis does not appear to have an effect on VRE colonization or infection, or on rates of infection with gram-positive bacteria. Elimination of vancomycin prophylaxis in renal transplant patients may be a reasonable part of an overall program to limit vancomycin usage, although as a single measure, its impact may be minimal. Vancomycin surgical prophylaxis may be of greater importance in pancreas transplants.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Vancomycin and Cefuroxime for Infection Prophylaxis in Coronary Artery Bypass SurgeryInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1998
- Manipulation of a Hospital Antimicrobial Formulary to Control an Outbreak of Vancomycin-Resistant EnterococciClinical Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Risk Factors Associated with Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Infection or Colonization in 145 Matched Case Patients and Control PatientsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Nosocomial Infections with Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus fuecium in Liver Transplant Recipients: Risk Factors for Acquisition and MortalityClinical Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Bloodstream infections with vancomycin-resistant enterococciArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1996
- Infectious Complications Following Pancreatic Transplantation: Incidence, Microbiological and Clinical Characteristics, and OutcomeClinical Infectious Diseases, 1995
- Major trends in the microbial etiology of nosocomial infectionThe American Journal of Medicine, 1991
- The enterococcus: a classic example of the impact of antimicrobial resistance on therapeutic optionsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1991
- Plasmid-Mediated Resistance to Vancomycin and Teicoplanin in Enterococcus FaeciumNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Factors Contributing to the Declining Mortality Rate in Renal TransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978