Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 February 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Cladistics
- Vol. 20 (1) , 47-55
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2003.00008.x
Abstract
So‐called DNA barcodes have recently been proposed to answer the problem of specimen identification and to quantify global biodiversity. We show that this proposition is wanting in terms of rationale, methodology and interpretation of results. In addition to falling short of all its stated goals, the method abandons the benefits of morphological studies in favor of a limited molecular identification system that would ultimately impede our understanding of biodiversity.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Thebig machineand the much‐maligned taxonomist DNA taxonomy and the webSystematics and Biodiversity, 2003
- Modernizing the Tree of LifeScience, 2003
- A plea for DNA taxonomyPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Biological identifications through DNA barcodesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2003
- The intellectual content of taxonomy: a comment on DNA taxonomyTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2003
- Shortcuts in systematics? A commentary on DNA-based taxonomyTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2003
- DNA points the way ahead in taxonomyNature, 2002
- Phylogeography of Brown Bears (Ursus arctos) of Alaska and Paraphyly within the UrsidaeMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1996
- Evolutionary Classification Using Convex PheneticsSystematic Zoology, 1986
- Some Concepts for the Estimation of Evolutionary Relationships in Systematic BotanySystematic Botany, 1978