Underdetection of Ventricular Tachycardia Using a 40 ms Stability Criterion: Effect of Antiarrhythmic Therapy
- 1 December 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 20 (12) , 2882-2892
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb05456.x
Abstract
Inappropriate shocks can complicate cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Among solutions proposed to avoid oversensing are algorithms to reduce inappropriate detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) or sinus tachycardia. In patients not on antiarrythmic drugs, an interval stability criterion of 40 ms has been validated with the Medtronic PCD to discriminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) from AF. With this algorithm, VT is considered stable if no interval varies from one of the three preceding intervals by more than 40 ms. If an interval does not fulfill this criterion, the VT event counter is reset to zero. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of underdetection when this criterion is applied in patients treated with antiarrhythmic drugs. We studied 132 sustained monomorphic VTs induced in 42 patients during 101 electrophysiological studies (EPS). EPS were performed without treatment (group I, 24 patients, 44 VTs); on Class Ia drug (group II, 17 patients, 24 VTs); Class Ic drug (group III, 22 patients, 39 VTs); or sotalol (group IV, 17 patients, 25 VTs). The endocardial electrogram of all VT episodes was digitized and the stability algorithm was applied. The reset arrhythmias were distributed among no delay, small, moderate (< 10 s) and important (> 15 s) delay in VT detection. The relation between drug use and reset was analyzed. Reset was found in 86 (65%) of induced VTs. No difference in heart rate or induction mode was shown between reset and nonreset VTs. There was a significative association between drug use and reset probability (Chi2 significantly different, P < 0.05). In patients treated with Class Ic drugs, the probability of finding an important delay in VT detection was 12.5% versus 0% in nontreated patients or in patients treated with sotalol. We conclude that a stability criterion of 40 ms is probably safe in nontreated patients but should be used with caution in patients treated with antiarrhythmics, especially in the presence of Class Ic drugs.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electrophysiologic effects of antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the prediction of successful suppression of induced ventricular tachycardiaAmerican Heart Journal, 1995
- Underdetection of ventricular tachycardia by algorithms to enhance specificity in a tiered-therapy cardioverter-defibrillatorJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- Electrocardiographically Documented Unnecessary, Spontaneous Shocks in 241 Patients With Implantable Cardioverter DefibrillatorsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1992
- Effects of Antiarrhythmic Drugs on Defibrillation Threshold in Patients with the Implantable Cardioverter DefibrillatorPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1992
- Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Proarrhythmia: Case Report and Review of the LiteraturePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1991
- Changes in cycle length at the onset of sustained tachycardias—importance for antitachycardiac pacingAmerican Heart Journal, 1988
- Success of chronic defibrillation and the role of antiarrhythmic drugs with the automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillatorThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- ABSTRACTSPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1987
- Proarrhythmic effects of antiarrhythmic drugsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- ReplyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1986