Does the testing method make a difference? The case of reading comprehension
- 1 December 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Language Testing
- Vol. 1 (2) , 147-170
- https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228400100203
Abstract
The paper reports results of a study which examined the effect that various methods used for testing reading comprehension have on the measurement of that trait. The methods investigated in this research were multiple-choice and open-ended questions, each presented in L1 and L2, on the same L2 texts. Results indicated that each of the testing methods produced different degrees of difficulty for the test takers, and that each of the variables - method, text and language - had a significant effect on students' scores in reading comprehension. These effects were strongest on low-level students. Recommendations are made with regard to the use of multiple procedures for testing reading comprehension as well as to the need for further research towards finding the most valid method for testing that trait.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- On taking language testsLanguage Testing, 1984
- THE STABILITY OF ORAL PROFICIENCY ASSESSMENT ON THE ORAL INTERVIEW TESTING PROCEDURESLanguage Learning, 1983
- SOME USES OF MENTALISTIC DATA IN SECOND LANGUAGE RESEARCH1Language Learning, 1981
- NATIVE AND NONNATIVE SPEAKER PERFORMANCE ON CLOZE TESTS1Language Learning, 1980